Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34

Thread: Mike Tyson's Intergalactic Punch Released

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by PhreQuencYViii
    Unless I'm misunderstanding something I thought it was kind of cool you can buy a repro of it or get the rom. I dunno. It is kind of funky stamping your name on it but is it really obtrusive? Is it just on the repros? I don't see it being a big deal if it's just on the repros but it is kind of goofy. They could just stick there name on the cartridge after all.
    I think they had problems with Airball where someone not only took the ROM but also used the same cover art they created. A few were even passed off on ebay as "originals". As Assembler said this can be worked around but they added an extra step to those sellers who want to deceive others.

    In conclusion. You get the ROM for free, they made is harder for scammers, the game sucks anyway and I don't think what they did would affect gameplay on a game that sucks this hard anyway. This isn't Final Fantasy here. In most cases you download it and what play it for 5 mins and never look at it again.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blur2040
    Just because the game is shit, it doesn't make it right. Slapping your name on somebody else's game is cheesy. Even worse is selling "reproductions" of it. That's just straight up bootlegging/piracy.

    "Reproduction." Now theres a term I loathe. Sugar coating it doesn't make it any less illegal.
    As for the legal issue. I'm sure it isn't. If not criminal it is a civil suit if MT wanted to push it. Are you saying that this and all other unreleased games should never been dumped at all? That is the only way to stay clear of that minefield. As I said before these arguments are self defeating unless you don't want anything released.

  2. #22
    ASSEMbler Extreme
    Never Logs Out
    PhreQuencYViii's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    VA, USA
    Posts
    5,423
    I think with this sort of stuff theres no cut and dry opinion on it...or there shouldn't be. Everything is it's own seperate case. You can't go one field or the other all the time.


  3. #23
    Admin
    ASSEMbler Regix
    Pillar of the Community
    ASSEMbler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    15,978
    Blog Entries
    13
    Better than nothing, so I'll take what I can get.

    "The lourve" image is epic. Kudos!

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by ASSEMbler
    Better than nothing, so I'll take what I can get.

    "The lourve" image is epic. Kudos!
    Thanks, I thought it got the point across fairly well.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Buyatari
    I think a bag of food given to homeless is a better example
    a $1500 dollar bag of hobo chow.

  6. #26
    Game Genie Member Elite
    Blur2040's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    1,864
    Quote Originally Posted by Buyatari
    As for the legal issue. I'm sure it isn't. If not criminal it is a civil suit if MT wanted to push it. Are you saying that this and all other unreleased games should never been dumped at all? That is the only way to stay clear of that minefield. As I said before these arguments are self defeating unless you don't want anything released.
    I am saying I don't think they should be dumped at all. I try to avoid that idea in my mind as I do enjoy seeing how games evolved...but...bottom line is that "reproductions" aren't exactly on solid legal ground and distributing dumped protos isn't much better. Nobody really has a right to a copy of the ROM or a "reproduction" of a cartridge.

    Legal issues don't seem to come up for "reproduction" makers...but it doesn't mean they can't.

    Edit: I also feel the need to give more kudos to devhackr. Hilarious image.
    Last edited by Blur2040; 04-17-2009 at 02:11 AM.
    Death to Bill and Ted!

  7. #27


    Couldn't help it.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by DevHackr


    Couldn't help it.
    perfect !~

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Blur2040
    I am saying I don't think they should be dumped at all. I try to avoid that idea in my mind as I do enjoy seeing how games evolved...but...bottom line is that "reproductions" aren't exactly on solid legal ground and distributing dumped protos isn't much better. Nobody really has a right to a copy of the ROM or a "reproduction" of a cartridge.

    Legal issues don't seem to come up for "reproduction" makers...but it doesn't mean they can't.

    Edit: I also feel the need to give more kudos to devhackr. Hilarious image.
    The best reason for rom dumps is preservation. Eventually prototype or games that there are only a few copies of will disappear into peoples collections, boxes, etc. Never to be seen again and eventually destroyed with the game lost forever. By dumping the rom we now have a digital copy of the code that will last forever. The MAME project for example started and continues to be a preservation project, to preserve the arcade machines that eventually end up in landfills.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by DeckardBR
    The best reason for rom dumps is preservation. Eventually prototype or games that there are only a few copies of will disappear into peoples collections, boxes, etc. Never to be seen again and eventually destroyed with the game lost forever. By dumping the rom we now have a digital copy of the code that will last forever. The MAME project for example started and continues to be a preservation project, to preserve the arcade machines that eventually end up in landfills.
    If the true mission here is preservation then it is best to minimize any bickering over how someone donates,why they donate,how much they donate or the way they donate. The main argument here is not what is the right way to do things. The argument should be how as a community do you increase the number of releases.

    Take what you can get and leave the door open so they come back and come back often. Encourage them in a positive way to do it again and again till there is nothing left. No one will see this thead and change the way they do things for the positive. Those who agree will continue business as usual but those who don't are less likely to release anything at all.

  11. #31
    New member Ninjawurst's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    13
    Thx for the information .
    Last edited by Ninjawurst; 06-16-2009 at 09:22 PM.

  12. #32
    TIGERRRRRR!
    Tribuni Angusticlavii
    Taucias's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,904
    Quote Originally Posted by Blur2040
    Just because the game is shit, it doesn't make it right. Slapping your name on somebody else's game is cheesy. Even worse is selling "reproductions" of it. That's just straight up bootlegging/piracy.

    "Reproduction." Now theres a term I loathe. Sugar coating it doesn't make it any less illegal.
    Playing it is itself illegal, so it's a moot point.
    "No one shall defeat the Infamous SAGAT! Ah hahahahahaha!"


    Anthaemia.: Anyway, that's enough crazy ranting and wild speculation for now...
    ASSEMbler: Please don't invite him here, there's no room for crazies here we're full up.
    Barc0de: I m biased for Nintendo

  13. #33

  14. #34
    Member Hardcore
    skavenger216's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    North Olmsted, Ohio
    Posts
    1,019
    :lol:@ DevHackr's post.
    Quote Originally Posted by MottZilla
    You do know they make games that come on these thin round almost "Disc" shaped plastic and metal objects, that you put inside the 360 right?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •