Donno how common this type of thread emerges but heres mine:
http://home.comcast.net/~ruralclass/desktop.png
Donno how common this type of thread emerges but heres mine:
http://home.comcast.net/~ruralclass/desktop.png
Nothing terribly interesting:
![]()
Goat is animal
great.
this one paper is in french btw , do you know what the word is meaning?
"(...)A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population." Dont let media feed you with lies. open your eyes and search information yourself.
Heres mine. Very cluttered, my desktop is just a dumping ground for me. The pic is one from nasa, taken from the moon of the Earth rising - I thought it was pretty cool..
![]()
a bit of topic, sorry , but why there's no stars in the space?
oh, yeah because it wasn't reall when they said they where on moon. :smt043
"(...)A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population." Dont let media feed you with lies. open your eyes and search information yourself.
I read a long winded reply to this, i'll try to find it somewhere...
Got it:
HB's are hoax believers - This description was taken from http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
Good: The stars are there! They're just too faint to be seen.
This is usually the first thing HBs talk about when discussing the Hoax. That amazes me, as it's the silliest assertion they make. However, it appeals to our common sense: when the sky is black here on Earth, we see stars. Therefore we should see them from the Moon as well.
I'll say this here now, and return to it many times: the Moon is not the Earth. Conditions there are weird, and our common sense is likely to fail us.
The Moon's surface is airless. On Earth, our thick atmosphere scatters sunlight, spreading it out over the whole sky. That's why the sky is bright during the day. Without sunlight, the air is dark at night, allowing us to see stars.
On the Moon, the lack of air means that the sky is dark. Even when the Sun is high off the horizon during full day, the sky near it will be black. If you were standing on the Moon, you would indeed see stars, even during the day.
So why aren't they in the Apollo pictures? Pretend for a moment you are an astronaut on the surface of the Moon. You want to take a picture of your fellow space traveler. The Sun is low off the horizon, since all the lunar landings were done at local morning. How do you set your camera? The lunar landscape is brightly lit by the Sun, of course, and your friend is wearing a white spacesuit also brilliantly lit by the Sun. To take a picture of a bright object with a bright background, you need to set the exposure time to be fast, and close down the aperture setting too; that's like the pupil in your eye constricting to let less light in when you walk outside on a sunny day.
So the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time. If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars!
It's that simple. Remember, this the usually the first and strongest argument the HBs use, and it was that easy to show wrong. Their arguments get worse from here.
Also, in case anyones interested, i got the picture from http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html Only problem is that they aren't quite wallpaper size, but still very impressive

I still haven't installed everything after the upgrade, so don't strange the lack of icons on the desktop. :smt023 Still need to install tons of stuff, including Dreamweaver, Photoshop, DevC++, ...
RIIIIIIIDGE RACER!!
:smt040
A-Spec level: 28 / B-Spec level: 13
Current car: Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Final Prototype 2014
Number of cars on garage: 94 ( Check my Garage HERE )
B-Spec driver shared: N.Schumacher - Class 13
## Cars available for trade : 2x Toyota CELICA XX 2800GT '81 ) ##
Wallpaper deleted at the request that someone may be punished at school for looking at porn :smt023
I would say thank you but i dunno that wallpapers scary!Originally Posted by SilverBolt
Forum Moderator
he he I love it though, sadly living at home I couldn't use it, just another year or so ^^;Originally Posted by Paulo
LOL indeedOriginally Posted by Paulo
Here's my current one, I rotate manually about every week or so, whenever I get bored. My desktop is usually a lot worse than this, as it's a bit of a miserable dumping ground for all my downloaded crap.
Thanks, Dreamcast GD-ROM omake! :smt023
My desktop is only a blue background with only 6 or 7 icons and 1 of those quickstart buttons, so I don't think it's worth a whole screenshot. Most of the time there's a program maximized on the screen, so I barely see the desktop.
hmmm nice desktops guys :smt023 :-)
i just keep it simple, dont have a pic coz i turned all the useless services off and the name of the shortcuts have blue around it and it just looks bad.
![]()
Here's mine. It's actually at 1280x1024 resolution. YOu can view the full size one at the bottom URL.
http://img54.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img54...mydesktop1.jpg
Behold the power of a non Explorer based shell !! :drinkers: :drinkers: :drinkers: :drinkers:
Is that longhorn beta? or overhyped linux?
Bookmarks